SB Nation - Login for mobile commenting

The Phinsider

A New Way to Draft: An Alternative Format to the NFL Draft

NEW YORK, NY - APRIL 28:  NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell speaks at the podium during the 2011 NFL Draft at Radio City Music Hall on April 28, 2011 in New York City.  (Photo by Chris Trotman/Getty Images)

Chris Trotman - Getty Images

about 1 year ago: NEW YORK, NY - APRIL 28: NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell speaks at the podium during the 2011 NFL Draft at Radio City Music Hall on April 28, 2011 in New York City. (Photo by Chris Trotman/Getty Images)

The NFL Draft is one of any pro football fan’s favorite times of the year. It’s the point when hope springs eternal for every team. Teams will be choosing from the best collegiate players and filling their rosters with brand new talent. The current three day long process comprises seven rounds with each team given one spot in each round. The position in each round is determined by how each team finished the season. The team with the worst record picks first in a round and it works it’s way back until the team that won the Super Bowl picks last in that round. Teams can trade picks to other teams, including picks from future drafts. Now I’m sure that most of you are saying, "Thank you Captain Obvious, I KNOW how the draft works!" But I only bring it up to offer an alternative to the current draft format.

I was reading some fantasy football stuff before last season because I was going to create a league with my colleagues. A question came up about whether or not we should have a snake draft or auction draft. I read some other sports writers discussing the auction draft and they said it was so much better than the snake format. Of course I started thinking, "What if the real NFL Draft was auction style?" So now, I present to you, my idea for the NFL Auction Draft.

Star-divide

Format

Each team will be given auction "points" with which to bid on players. How many points are determined by how each team finished. The team with the worst record will get the most points and the Super Bowl team will have the lowest number of points. Basically it would work just like the slotting method used currently. The exact amount of points is irrelevant to the discussion (I didn’t really feel like developing a working scale for the post). For the sake of discussion, let’s assume the NFL has a system to where each team has enough points to theoretically last each round. The draft will still be seven rounds long.

As the draft begins, the team with the first slot will nominate a player to bid on. Once the player is nominated, each team will be given a certain amount of time to place a bid and/or counter bid. The bids would be by secret ballot. A bid counter would be visible to all teams so they know the amount of the current bid. After a certain period of time, say ten minutes, the commissioner would call for a final bid. This would keep teams from making a last second bid to trump another team. After the point totals have been tallied, the commissioner will announce which team won the bidding and award the player to that team. The team that won the bidding for that player loses the amount of points used for the winning bid for the remainder of the draft. The team in the next slot will nominate another player and the bidding process will begin again. After the last slot makes a nomination and the bidding on that player ends, the round ends. The second round begins the same way as the first and so will each subsequent round. The only difference is that some teams will have spent points in the first round and won’t have as many points to bid in the second. At the end of the seventh round, any players not nominated for the draft will become free agents, just like the current process. Players can be traded for points, but teams cannot trade for points in a current or future drafts. Let's look at the 2012 Draft as an example. Indianapolis gets the first slot and they nominate Andrew Luck. After the ten minutes is up, the commissioner announces that the Miami Dolphins had the highest bid and won the rights to Andrew Luck. The Dolphins draft Luck and lose the points they used in the bid. The St. Louis Rams have the next slot and nominate Matt Kalil. Minnesota nominates 'player X', Cleveland nominates 'player Y' and so on. That's a brief glimpse of the process. On to the pros and cons.

Pros

The biggest advantage to the auction format is the amount of strategy involved. Teams will have to evaluate what needs are most important, which players they will target and how they will go after them. They will also have to have contingency plans for if they get outbid. Teams will also have to formulate a strategy to "bluff" and try and get opponents to overbid for players. Teams will have to have a strategy on who they decide to nominate in each round as well. Watching teams bid against each other would be good entertainment also (imagine how much more fun drafts would be in Madden too).

Another advantage to this format is that every team will have some chance to acquire a top rated player. For instance, there are several teams that would love to draft Andrew Luck or Robert Griffin III in this draft. It’s all but a certainty that Luck will be the number one pick and Griffin will fall in the top five. An auction format will give any and every team a chance to bid on one of these players. So a team like the Dolphins or Redskins would have a shot at Luck or Griffin without limiting future drafts in trades.

Another advantage of this format would be that teams would have more versatility about how they run their draft. A team could have a strategy where they target only two or three of the top prospects and go for that. For example, the Dolphins could try to acquire Luck, Kalil, and Blackmon. They will use all of their points to get those three players. Or a team could have a strategy where they don’t bid on the top tier players, but attempt to get more of the lower tier players. For example, the Dolphins could target several of the mid round prospects and try to get 10 of them. A team can be very versatile in this format.

Cons

The biggest disadvantage of this format is also one of the advantages: every team has a chance at every player. As it stands right now, the Patriots have zero chance to get Andrew Luck. Given the rivalry between them and the Colts, it’s doubtful it would happen, even if it were necessary. But let’s say Brady decided to retire unexpectedly after this season. In the auction format, the Patriots would have a chance to get Luck or Griffin. While it would be likely that another team with more points would outbid them, there is always the chance. It could be a case of the rich getting richer.

Another disadvantage is that parity, one of the selling points of the NFL, might be damaged. Not every team is operated intelligently. Some teams always tend to be bottom feeders while some teams always manage to stay at the top every year. An auction format might create more disparity between the well ran teams and the ones that can’t get out of their own way. Working in conjunction with the first disadvantage, smarter teams could run up the price on certain prospects, allowing good prospects to fall to them since other teams may have used up more points than they really wanted to.

Another disadvantage is that it’s possible that a team could go an entire draft without acquiring any new players. It would be unlikely, but it is within the realm of possibility. I’m sure some Dolphins fans will complain about whoever we draft in 2012. But can you imagine the backlash if we walked away from a draft completely empty handed? If this happened, a team expecting to get some players in the draft to fill needs could be put at a competitive disadvantage and that would affect the quality of the game.

Wrap Up


So there you have it. While I find the current draft process extremely entertaining, it can never hurt to think about it from a different perspective. I don’t know how an auction style draft would actually go over with teams and fans, but it would definitely be entertaining if nothing else. So what do you think? How do you feel about an auction draft format for the NFL draft?

1 recs  |  40 comments

Comments

Interesting idea

not sure of the merits though

Great concept!

It would be cool if the NFL read this post! Good writeup, Duke!

There is another con, and it's a big one:

I’ll bring this point up in an example. Say it’s the first pick of the draft, and The Colts decide to get silly and nominate a projected 4th round pick to the auction block. Nobody is going to vote on this kid because he will be a 4th round talent getting paid like a 1st rounder. Would he go undrafted if he got no bids? Does Indy automatically bid a point if they nominate?

Now, let’s look at this from the opposite perspective. Say it’s 2011 and you are Cam Newton. You are the consensus #1 pick of the draft, with the exception of a few Blaine Gabbert fanboys, and you get to watch all these lower round players get nominated in front of you. Your well-deserved pay-day gets smaller and smaller as you watch the less-talented guys get bid on first.

Interesting concept, but I like The Draft the way it is. In fact, I think it is one of the better selling points of NFL football.

what if

when u nominate there is an initial bid you must place based on the round so first rounders are paid accordingly and so on

You could pay the players based on how many auction

points were used to draft them. In other words, the auction points determine the amount you pay the player; supply and demand. So, the round you were drafted in may not necessarily matter anymore.

That's a good alternative.

In conjunction with a minimum bid.

i agree, a minimum bid

would greatly help the process and it would shrink the likelihood of teams falsely raising the stakes because you may just end up with a player you didn’t really want at a high price. The first pick in each round would have the highest minimum and it would decrease with every slot in every round. In this scenario, Cam Newton would still have been drafted first, but there is a chance that a pick 1-5 slots below him would cost more auction points. So, it could still disrupt the first pick of the draft being the highest paid, but I don’t think it would alter it too much.

You bring up some good points

I think there are a couple of options that would prevent the issues you mentioned. As Nicky mentioned in another comment, you could have a committee of draft specialists develop a consensus big board and let them nominate players instead of the teams. That way the top picks would be chosen where they would normally be chosen. A problem with that would be determining players for the big board. You have a weak DT class this year, but teams will need DTs. So guys that might get taken in the real draft, might not get drafted at all.

Another solution would be to require that the team that nominates a player also must bid on the player. There would be minimum bid requirements for each round, with the higher rounds having higher minimums. That would prevent some degree of what you mentioned. If Indy nominated a punter in the 1st, they would have to bid on him with a high minimum bid. No one else would bid and they would have wasted points.

another issue tho

if a player is “nominated” by a team and it is a secret ballot, teams obviously know the nominating team will bid high for the draftee so idk how keeping it secret would work as planned
its definately a cool idea though. i wonder if it would last longer than three days or shorter

That's not necessarily true.

When I participated in an auction draft, I almost always nominated highly sought players from positions that I already had filled. This way, I forced other teams to spend more money before my true target was actually nominated.

oh

so you nominate a player you dont necessarily want cuz the player you want will get nominated anyway. that makes sense. draft order doesnt even matter it could be completely random i guess

Yeah,

you could see people nominating punters in the first round and it be a legitimate strategy. Jets fans everywhere delight.

So does this totally negate the option of trading a player or players for anything other then players?
Also I think in order to give every team a legit shot of bidding on each player that the process would have to be

stretched out to at least 30 min. Also one of the best parts of the drafts is all the crazy ass draft day trades. Nothing gets you going more then hearing one of the guys saying “wait a minute there has been a trade!”.

Like last year when the Dolphins traded up to the end of the 2nd

and everyone thought, guess we are moving up for Ryan Mallett……… shows you what we know. lol

Yeah I was not sold on Mallett but I was ok with us at least taking a waiver on the kid and seeing what he had at

the next level.

What about the team

with the last remaining points. Do they get the all the remaining players at one point per player?

I wonder how many draft points....

we’d get for Columbo…?

My two

Payscale could/would be determined by the amount of points used to acquire said player.

As for Columbo, we would receive -700 points.

Maybe

we could at least trade him for some brownies to eat during the draft auction?

Wouldn't teams drive up the bid so the original team or another would have to keep going higher. A bidding war. They'd have nothing left to get other players.. lol
so, to me it would really benefit those teams with fewer positions to fill.

For example, if a team like the Miami Dolphins decide, we need a blockbuster QB and F the rest, we could use all of our points to grab the best QB. The same could be accomplished by say the Niners. So a team that is already pretty good would become exceptionally better by mortaging their entire dradft for one player. However, a team that has a variety of needs would be stuck with sub par players becuase they couldnt afford to go after the best of the best.

Good write up, but I vote no witha capital NO.

However, a team that has a variety of needs would be stuck with sub par players becuase they couldnt afford to go after the best of the best.

Nah. There would be plenty of good to great talent for those teams that were left.

you think....

i am imagining that the really good teams would just try and outbid everyone for the top 20 or so players. I see teams that have lots of spots to fill basically havign to do so with nothing but 2 rounders on down.

But still plenty of good talent in later rounds if your good at your job. JT was a 3rd rounder and Zach was a 6th.
If you build your team around good solid guys you will win games. There is also FA to fill holes. Then when you

start winning games you can start going the other route.

Even a case like this

Suppose a team like Indy or The Pats deciding to corner this years QB market and blowing all their points to get both Luck and RGIII. Even going as far as to either trade additional bit players for more points, or take Blackman for 8,000dp (draft points) then selling him for more dp to whomever was the next lowest bidder when time ran out.

This shit cray
Cray? Robert or fish?
This sounds like fun,

but the draft is about perfect as it is.

I have a better idea

Take away all of New England’s picks every year until Brady retires.

Would Never Work

This only works for fantasy football because in fantasy, you’re dealing with depth at a level that doesn’t exist in the NFL Draft. For example, in an ESPN standard scoring league, the top 6 RBs in points this year (Rice, McCoy, Jones-Drew, Foster, Turner, Lynch) all scored over 200 fantasy points this year. So there’s a real question of how much to spend on the top RB versus the #5 RB because they’re all going to be studs for your team. Similarly, the top 4 fantasy QBs this year (Rodgers, Brees, Brady, Stafford) all had over 400 fantasy points – also a real question as to whether to save your points and take the #4 guy.

That kind of depth doesn’t exist in the NFL Draft. If you need a RB, will anyone actually consider taking the #6 RB (Doug Martin of Boise State according to WalterFootball.com) over the #1 RB (Trent Richardson) in order to conserve points? What about the #4 QB (Nick Foles) over Andrew Luck? An auction would never work in real life because, in real life, there are simply not enough studs to make conserving points worth it.

I agree with you that there aren't enough studs, but

teams and/or the media may present the draft as every team looking for a stud with every pick and we all know that isn’t the case. Teams do draft back-up developmental QBs, special team players, 3rd down specialists, etc. So, yes, if you need a #1 RB, there’s only one of them and you’d have to try to spend your points there and hope you outbid everyone else. As it stands now, if you need a QB and you are drafting in the #11 slot, you really don’t even have a shot at getting him.

I can remember who brought this up, maybe spinner, what if we traded all our picks from round 4-7 to get another pick in the first 3 rounds

and only take BPS’s on the board. Good idea there also. Just go after the guys you want. And by the way Rec’d.

Nice read Duke, I dont like the idea, It would take for ever, and lets say the Super Bowl winner only needed say 2 studs.

ex. The Pats who are solid on O, and just sold the house for 3 picks each year.

I like it..

A couple tweaks I think might work would be..
A) keeping the trade chaos by allowing teams only one “winning bid” per round. Treat winning bids like draft picks, they can be traded. If a team wins the bid for a player, they are taken out of the bidding for that round unless they have traded for a second bid.
B) if you are going to pay based on bid points used, you don’t need to pay attention to draft order or nominees. No selections by teams, have a committee or scouting service set the “nomination order” and allow every team to bid based on what player comes up. For instance, this year, the number 1 guy is Luck. So he comes up for bidding first.
Overall, I really like this idea, and I think you can really flesh it out and have something interesting with very few flaws

The premise is wrong.

You’ve presented an idea to make the draft more interesting, but the draft isn’t really about entertainment. It’s presented as entertainment, because the NFL wants to market everything that isn’t nailed down, but it is really only about the business of football. The NFL isn’t going to disrupt competitive balance to make the draft more interesting any more than they are going to do it for free agency or mid-week practices.

But...

It might be entertaining if you had to bid to practice that week :)

Its an intrestting idea

but alot would depend on how the points would be initially allocated.

You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of The Phinsider to post a comment.