Andy Marlin - Getty Images for EA Sports
How would this man do if he was playing in today's NFL? (Photo by Andy Marlin/Getty Images for EA Sports)
This will be the start another series of weekly topics about views on the Dolphins, the AFC East, and the NFL in general. I'm going to start this on a subject that has been talked about for years, especially among Dolphin fans looking for a franchise QB. National media has talked about this as well more recently thanks to Drew Brees setting a new season passing record and two other QBs that topped the 5,000 yards passing mark in a single season. This week I'd like to talk about the evolution of the passing game over the past few decades and ideas to balance the league. More specifically, we'll look at the rule changes that allowed the passing game to open.
The first shift in passing in modern football came about in the 1970s. It started in 1974 when the NFL restricted the amount of contact defenders could have with a WR. Before then, CBs typically mauled WRs not just at the line of scrimmage, but along their routes. The NFL added additional measures in 1977 when they allowed defenders to make contact with a WR only once. The adoption of a 16-game regular season in the same year would also benefit with the increased passing numbers over the course of a season and a career. The rules would be altered once again in 1978 when defenders were able to maintain contact with a WR within 5 yards of the line of scrimmage, but were unable to make contact beyond that point. This was the start of the modern illegal contact rule. This rule though was not heavily enforced for many years though. In the same year, the NFL allowed offensive linemen to extend their arms and use open hands in pass protection, allowing them more time to protect the QB. Some violent hits, such as directly striking or swinging for the head, neck, or face were prohibited in 1980 when they were added under "personal foul" penalties. This may not have helped much, but you could argue that healthier WRs equates to a better passing game. Still, there were plenty reasons for WRs to fear the footsteps of a safety.
Since 1995, the NFL has allowed a WR forced out of bounds by a defender to return in bounds and make a play. This helped eliminate the move of "chucking" a WR out of bounds to remove him from a play. In 1996, the NFL announced they'd actually enforce the illegal contact penalty, created in 1978, more stringently than before. The rule was no longer just a recommendation. In 2001, the NFL announced Roughing the QB penalty would be enforced more strictly and specifically targeted late hits. By 2002, they protected the QB even further by barring helmet-to-helmet contact with a QB at any time, even after a change of possession. The NFL again tightened down enforcement of already existing rules for illegal contact, pass interference, and defensive holding in 2004. QBs received even more protection in 2006 when the NFL barred hits to the QBs below their knees unless the defensive player was blocked into the QB. WRs saw additional protection in 2009 when contact to the head of a defenseless receiver was prohibited. The NFL expanded the rules for defenseless receivers to include all players in 2010. They also threatened an additional crackdown on these penalties and threatened players with suspensions.

As you can see from the recap of the rules, it wasn't until the mid-90s when defensive players were called out more for penalties and in the past 5 years, the QBs and receivers have enjoyed much more protection than ever before. Does a WR need to fear the safety's foot steps now that he knows he can't be hit until he gets both feet on the ground? Would players like Steve Atwater and John Lynch still make it in today's NFL?
The shift in passing has been obvious, but I think only so much of it has to do with the evolution of players themselves. I don't believe better talent at QB is necessarily the answer, but I do think the emergence of receiving TEs has played a nice benefit. Still, I think the largest factor to the passing game we see now is attributed to major rule changes in the name of player safety.
While I am all for the protection of player safety, I do fear so much power has been stripped from defenses. I understand that sports is offensive-minded. Just like the NFL, other sports such as the NBA (more fouls for less contact), MLB (allowing steroids teams moving in fences for more HRs), and NHL (widening the nets) have all adjusted their own ways to favor more offense.
Prior to 2008, a QB has only surpassed 5,000 yards passing in a season only a single time. Brees became the second QB to reach that milestone in 2008. In 2011, 3 QBs alone topped 5,000 passing yards. Only 10 years ago, surpassing 7.0 YPA for a QB was considered very good. Only 11 QBs would reach that mark. 10 QBs surpassed that mark in 2003. By 2008, 17 QBs reached that mark. Over the years, we've changed what we have come to expect from QBs. A 60% completion percentage was once considered a milestone for a successful season. In 1983, only 8 QBs completed over 60% of their passes. 20 QBs surpassed that in 2010. Now, that is just the baseline for a QB. In 1983, when the defense still had an even ground, 10 QBs had 5% or more of their passes intercepted, including John Elway and Ken Stabler. Only 4 QBs, including Dan Marino, had less than 3% of their passes intercepted. In 2010, only a single QB had 5% or more of his passes be intercepted. On the flip side, 18 QBs had less than 3% of their passes intercepted. Offensive production has come at the sacrifice of the defense. At some point, there needs to be an even balance between offense and defense. So how would I recommend balancing out the two sides?
I won't try to remove rule changes for player safety because we already know that won't happen. Though I would be more lenient with incidental contact to the helmet, specifically when a defender's hand comes in contact with a QB's helmet or when a defender's shoulder hits a WR in the chest. Instead, I would alter the illegal contact rules. I'd like to see the 5-yard gap given for legal contact between a CB and a WR extended to 10 yards. With all the protection a QB gets, I think the extra 5 yards would help the defense greatly. Top running WRs may see a drop in value due to more contact slowing them down unless they can break free, but the WRs that are more physical, like Brandon Marshall, would be more impactful. It may not seem like much, but the split second longer could be all the time in the world for football. Beyond that, I may also look to tighten down the rules on offensive pass interference. A defender is already fighting an uphill battle when the WR can almost maul him, but the slightest contact a defender makes with a WR will be flagged for pass interference.
That is my idea for balancing out the passing game and giving the defense a little bit more power. What would you do to reverse the trend? Would you reverse the trend at all?
2 recs | 22 comments
First!
Dolphinator - January 10, 2012 via mobile
Weinner!
Alpha6 - January 10, 2012
Nice post, and I agree with much of what you have to say.
Will never change though if the players union have their way.
BahamaDolfan - January 10, 2012
Good post
Not sure about extending the 5 yard bump rule, because it would practically eliminate smaller WR’s who can beat the initial jam with quickness, but can’t sustain high speeds. Think Davone Bess and Wes Welker. They are going to have a hard time running routes other than slants and quick outs.
I would be a little more forgiving on the hand fighting and jostling at the top of the route. Give the corners more leeway to play the ball and battle for it, and reward good coverage, instead of making coverage easier.
Also, what about, say, allowing hits below the shoulders on defenseless WR’s? Still focused on player safety by limiting and penalizing head shots, but allow hard hitting safeties to still have an impact with big shots to the chest/ribs…
Little Nicky 21 - January 10, 2012 via Android app
Defenseless Receivers
That is what I meant when I’d be more lenient on the defenseless receiver penalties. It is only considered a penalty if the receiver is hit in the helmet. A shot to the chest is not considered a hit on a defenseless receiver, but flags are often thrown because it often looks like a hit to the helmet. Pretty much, if the call is in doubt, the refs throw the flag.
Finhead83 - January 10, 2012
Yeah, I think you should be allowed to throw the challenge flag on the headshots to QB's and defenseless receivers.
The game is moving way too fast for a ref to make the right call many times. Let a coach throw the flag so it can be reviewed. Too many times guys are thrown into the quarterback or a solid hit to the chest looks like a helmet to helmet shot.
mjams - January 10, 2012 via mobile
Also, what if you kept the contact within 5yds rule for wideouts but made it 10yds for TE's?
That would help create a more diverse defensive strategy for dealing with all these dual threat TE’s. You could choose to match them with solid coverage from a nickel back/safety or manhandle him with a linebacker.
mjams - January 10, 2012 via mobile
I don’t understand this (non) sentence. Were such hits allowed, blocked, or regularly practiced at that point, and on which players?
discuit - January 10, 2012
I adjusted it
It was outlawed for all types of tackles, not just aimed at a position. This was the end of many of those clothesline type tackles defensive players used to make.
Finhead83 - January 10, 2012
Very nice read !! Rec'd 83
21Dave - January 10, 2012
In 10 years the league will be two-hand touch.
BSerious72 - January 10, 2012
i dont think so
If you look at nfl trends of the past, they only last like 20 or 25 years. Look at the option offense, ground and pound, etc. I think high powered passing will die out as this generation goes. The hgh powered passing was started by marino, but we were the early adopters, it became league-wide around the time peyton manning came in. Its should expire around the time the current young stars, like stafford, newton, etc. retire. What it will be replaced by, I don’t know, but the nfl will change even further, that’s for sure.
AnishB15 - January 10, 2012 via mobile
They could take the helmets off?
The defenders could also learn to tackle better. I don’t mean this in a sarcastic way, being from a rugby playing country, but since the way you can hit a player is changing, players must be able to tackle better. I have seen players, whose job is only to defend, use shockingly bad tecnique in tackling.
sirdolphin - January 10, 2012
Actually...
Many have advocated the removal of the face masks. They believe that with such head protection it causes players to become fearless and make the type of hits we see today. They think with the removal of the face masks football players would revert to learning tackling techniques that protected their head. You may have meant it as a joke, but there are a lot of people who genuinely back that.
Finhead83 - January 10, 2012
Not really joking, though don't expect it to happen.
If the type of hits that require that protection are all outlawed though, why wear the pads and helmets? There’s going to be a lot of broken legs if the players hit low with helmets.
sirdolphin - January 10, 2012
excellant post
To answer the question under the pic, if marino played in the nfl today, he would have had over 5500 yards, maybe even 6000.
AnishB15 - January 10, 2012 via mobile
ROI's on fraud slow? lol
Alpha6 - January 10, 2012
Aren't they always?
But this wasn’t written at work!
Finhead83 - January 10, 2012
Get rid of the tuck rule
beneny - January 10, 2012
15 years to late!
wild zion beaver - January 11, 2012
12
Patssuck456 - January 22, 2012
Up Next....
the future is looking us right in the face (and I hope it will be doing so wearing aqua and green for the next fifteen years). I’m referring specifically to RGIII and in more general terms, scrambling QBs such as Vick and Cam. As the pass mileage adds up, defenses will focus on CBs and safeties to cut down that chunk yardage. The next evolution is QBs will can kill you with accurate throws and, when you take that away, can torch you with their feet as well. Mike Vick ( and even Kordel Stewart) were the front runners (ba domp… ching!) to the style, but unrefined. The passing was not married to the running ability. Vick is evolving, but the league is not ready to embrace it. The team(s) that jump on the wagon first and can develop specialized coaching techniques for those type of QBs will dominate the early years of the next phase of the NFL paradigm shift for the new decade.
PhinNomenol! - January 10, 2012
You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of The Phinsider to post a comment.